The reaction of the Manchester United supporters and players during their run-in were pivotal in convincing Ineos to retain Erik ten Hag as manager.
United’s co-owner, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, and his Ineos cohorts had planned to dismiss Ten Hag in May and sounded out a number of potential replacements, among them Kieran McKenna, Thomas Tuchel, Roberto de Zerbi and Mauricio Pochettino. Brentford boss Thomas Frank was also reportedly spoken to.
After an interminable end-of-season review, United leaked their decision to keep Ten Hag 17 days after he masterminded their uplifting FA Cup final victory over Manchester City.
READ MORE: Erik ten Hag’s ‘contract latest’ as Ratcliffe £10m Man United demand emerges
READ MORE: Man City chief offers subtle warning to Ratcliffe over Berrada poaching
United’s preparations for the final were buoyed by successive Premier League victories over Newcastle United and Brighton, though momentum began in the wake of the season nadir away to Crystal Palace on May 6.
After the 4-0 drubbing at Selhurst Park, United players were greeted supportively by the away following and that is understood to have had a significant bearing on Ineos’s final decision. Six days later, United performed creditably but toothlessly in a 1-0 home defeat to Arsenal and the fight on display was appreciated by Ratcliffe, who was in attendance at Old Trafford.
Ten Hag recalled Sofyan Amrabat for his first Premier League start in four months against Arsenal and the Moroccan played his way into the cup final starting XI over Casemiro.
Seven of the starters against Arsenal on May 12 lined up against City at Wembley 13 days later and Ten Hag addressed United’s bluntness by dropping striker Rasmus Hojlund in favour of a strikerless system against Newcastle, Brighton and City. Hojlund emerged to score against Newcastle and Brighton before a productive impact against City.
As the Manchester Evening News revealed two days after the FA Cup triumph, United gave serious consideration to sticking with Ten Hag as early as the immediate aftermath of their final fixture.
There was a shift from Ineos on May 27, the day that McKenna verbally accepted Ipswich Town’s substantial offer of a four-year contract. Chelsea had already conceded defeat in their efforts to prise McKenna from Ipswich as he favoured a move to United if he decided to leave Portman Road. Chelsea quickly sounded out Enzo Maresca, who joined from Leicester as Pochettino’s replacement.
On Sunday, Ten Hag suggested United’s contact with prospective replacements would not have been allowed in his homeland. “Here in Holland this is ‘not done’, in fact, it’s not even allowed here,” he said on NOS. “But in England, they have different rules and laws.
“Ineos took their time. They are new in football, it’s normal to reflect on the season. It’s no secret that they talked with multiple candidates.
“Manchester United have told me that they spoke with Tuchel but they eventually came to the conclusion that they already have the best manager.”