The culture secretary has said former BBC newsreader Huw Edwards should return his salary after he admitted accessing indecent images of children.
Edwards was paid £200,000 after he was arrested in November while he was suspended by the broadcaster up until he resigned in April on medical advice.
On Wednesday, the 62-year-old BBC veteran pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky News at the Paris Olympics on Friday: “I think he ought to return his salary.
“I think having been arrested on such serious charges all the way back in November, to continue to receive that salary all the way through until he resigned is wrong and it’s not a good use of taxpayers’ money.
“I think most people in the country will agree with that but whether he does that or not is up to him.”
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Read more from Sky News:
Former rugby star banned for drink-driving
Olympic swimmer collapses following event
Tim Davie, director general of the BBC, said on Thursday the corporation was aware Edwards had been arrested over the most serious category of indecent images of children when it happened.
He faced questions over why Edwards was not sacked then and why he continued to receive his salary – the highest of anybody at BBC News.
Ms Nandy added: “My concern is to make sure that not only are we getting the decision right in this case but we’re futureproofing the BBC so that when people come forward with concerns, when decisions like this have to be made we’re open and transparent and we’re fair and we use taxpayers money appropriately.
“This is something that matters to the director general of the BBC and it’s my job to make sure we get there.”
Mr Davie said the BBC did not sack Edwards after they were told of his arrest because the police said: ‘Look, we need to do our work in total confidence, we’ve arrested (Edwards) please keep this confidential.”
The BBC director general added: “And at that point, I think the principle is clear in my mind, and I say we thought long and hard about this, this wasn’t a knee-jerk decision.
“And it was difficult but when the police, if you think about this in terms of precedent, people do get arrested and then we’ve had situations where (there were) no charges and there’s nothing there to be followed up on.
“In this case, we knew it was serious. We knew no specifics, apart from the category of the potential offences.”
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.