The Middle East is witnessing intense conflicts, due to the dominance of certain countries that steer it according to their interests, without regard for the interests of its peoples.
The Egyptian political analyst, Elhamy al-Meligy, attributed the escalation of these conflicts to several factors, including regional tensions and international interventions.
He pointed out that the conflicts in the region, whether in Palestine, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, or Lebanon, stem from a mix of local disputes and international conflicts. He added that major powers, such as the United States, Russia, Iran, and Turkey, play a role in shaping the course of these conflicts.
He also saw that ideology and religious beliefs play a role in this escalation, explaining that the conflict between Hamas and Israel is based on ideological and religious roots that extend for more than a century. Similarly, the wars in Yemen and Syria mix religious and political ideology.
He also considered that the absence of political solutions is one of the main reasons for the tensions in the Middle East, pointing out that the lack of sustainable political solutions and the failure of multiple peace attempts have contributed to making these conflicts “eternal,” and that the inability to reach comprehensive solutions reinforces the continuity of violence.
Regarding the implications of this on the Middle East, Elhamy al-Meligy pointed out that “the Middle East has turned into a battleground for major powers.” “Iran and Turkey are playing an increasing role, while the United States and Russia are deeply engaged in the region,” noting that “this international complexity makes it more difficult to reach solutions.”
He also saw that the Middle East will witness long-lasting wars, not to mention the fragmentation of countries, explaining that “current conflicts tend to fragment nations, as has happened in Syria, Yemen, and Sudan.” “The weakness of central states and the collapse of authority have led to a political vacuum filled by non-governmental armed groups.”
He pointed out that the entire region “will suffer from more economic and humanitarian crises, and that the economic recession deepens the suffering of the people and fuels further tensions.”
Elhamy al-Meligy stated that the current wars in the Middle East are becoming perpetual wars due to several factors, including complex external interventions. External powers often do not seek fundamental solutions but rather aim to strengthen their influence, which leads to the sustainability of conflicts instead of resolving them.
The Egyptian political analyst noted that the persistence of local conflicts due to regional and international interests is one of the reasons for the continuation of wars, pointing out that some forces benefiting from the ongoing conflict, whether internal or external, find that maintaining a state of war helps them achieve their interests.
On the other hand, Elhamy al-Meligy saw that the lack of trust between the conflicting parties has complicated reaching settlements and has led to the continuation of the dispute for long periods.
Regarding the parties that hinder the cessation of these wars, the Egyptian political analyst, Elhamy al-Meligy, stated that the major powers and the strategic interests that have intervened in regional conflicts have become part of the problem. He also noted that the strengthening of the military and political influence of these countries makes reaching political solutions more complicated.
Local regimes and armed “militias,” as seen in Syria and Yemen, have come to rely on the continuation of conflict to maintain their power, in addition to the role of armed “militias” that sustain their influence thanks to the ongoing wars.
He pointed out that regional and religious divisions, as well as sectarian and religious tensions between Sunnis and Shiites, Arabs and Iranians, Muslims and Jews, are what fuel these conflicts and make it difficult to reach consensus solutions.
As for the solutions to end conflicts, Elhamy al-Meligy believes that political settlements, international negotiations, and diplomatic solutions now require serious intervention from the international community and the imposition of comprehensive settlements, based on political dialogue and pressure on the warring parties.
He also stated that re-building state institutions is part of restoring stability, and that there should be a focus on building strong governmental institutions capable of providing security and essential services to their people.
He also pointed out the role of the United Nations and international organizations, noting that the UN and regional organizations like the Arab League need to play a
more effective role in crisis management and providing humanitarian support.
However, the Egyptian political analyst, Elhamy al-Meligy, added that “possible solutions must be comprehensive and target the root issues, starting from international interventions to internal reforms.” “These conflicts cannot be resolved unilaterally or solely through military force, but rather through achieving political settlements and rebuilding trust among the parties.”
T/ Satt.
ANHA