Friday, September 20, 2024

‘Eating the pets’ and Project 2025: fact checking the presidential debate

Must read

Donald Trump has repeatedly made false and misleading claims about immigrants “eating the pets” and his connection to Project 2025, among other topics, during his debate with Kamala Harris on Tuesday in Philadelphia.

At the first debate of this presidential election cycle in June – when Joe Biden was still the Democratic party’s nominee – moderators took a completely hands-off approach to factchecking. The light moderation meant that lies and half-truths, most frequently from Trump, went unchallenged during the primetime debate.

Here are the facts on some of the false claims offered during Tuesday’s debate.

Trump makes false claims about immigration

Donald Trump has spouted off a number of false claims about immigration. Among other allegations, he said immigrants are “taking over the towns … They’re going in violently.”

The facts: That’s false. Although some US cities have seen an influx of immigrants, most have arrived legally, with work permits or with authorization to stay while their cases are worked out in the courts.

There has been no widespread violence in these cities and overall, immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than the US-born according to multiple, extensive studies, including from the conservative Cato Institute.

Trump claims immigrants are ‘eating the pets’ in Ohio town

Trump repeated an unsubstantiated claim that immigrants are eating pets in an Ohio town, forcing the moderator to tell him that there is no proof of that.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats … they’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame,” the former president said.

The story of migrants allegedly eating pets has circulated in rightwing media in recent days and been repeated by Trump’s running mate JD Vance.

The facts: These are false and unsubstantiated claims.

“You bring up Springfield, Ohio, and ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there have been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community,” moderator David Muir told Trump.

The Springfield News-Sun reported on Monday that police have “received no reports related to pets being stolen and eaten”.

Trump and Harris argue over the ‘best’ or ‘worst’ economy

Trump boasted that the US experienced its “best” economy under his administration, while Harris noted that he left the US with “the worst unemployment since the Great Depression”.

The facts: They’re both wrong – Trump by a lot, and Harris by a shade.

Though unemployment spiked to its worst levels since the Great Depression in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it dipped back by the time Trump left office.

Meanwhile, Trump’s “best economy” line has been the bane of fact checkers since he was in office. Best is a very vague term – but by several measures, including GDP, unemployment, the trade deficit – the economy was far from its peak.

Here are some final numbers from his term, compiled by FactCheck.org:

  • The economy lost 2.7m jobs. The unemployment rate increased by 1.7 percentage points to 6.4%.

  • Paychecks grew faster than inflation. Average weekly earnings for all workers were up 8.4% after inflation.

  • After-tax corporate profits went up and the stock market set new records. The S&P 500 index rose 67.8%.

  • The international trade deficit Trump promised to reduce went up. The US trade deficit in goods and services in 2020 was the highest since 2008 and increased 36.3% from 2016.

  • The number of people lacking health insurance rose by 3 million.

  • The federal debt held by the public went up, from $14.4tn to $21.6 tn.

  • Home prices rose 27.5%, and the homeownership rate increased 2.1 percentage points to 65.8%.

Trump denies involvement in Project 2025

Trump denied knowledge of Project 2025, a 900-page plan for the aggressive rightwing overhaul of nearly every aspect of the federal government.

Project 2025 suggests ridding the federal ranks of many appointed roles and stacking agencies instead with more political appointees aligned with, and more beholden, to Trump’s policy prescriptions.

The facts: Though Trump has tried repeatedly to distance himself from the platform, which seeks to strip away reproductive, LGBTQ+ and voting rights, his policies align heavily with Project 2025.

As the Guardian’s Rachel Leingang reported: “Trump well knows the Heritage Foundation and has spoken at their events, and [Kevin] Roberts, Heritage’s leader, has previously said he and Trump have talked several times. Project 2025’s authors and supporters contain a ton of former Trump administration officials.”

Latest article